|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 2022 |
|
|
Convictions quashed where prosecution relied on uncorroborated accomplice evidence and improperly authenticated call‑logs.
Criminal law — Dangerous drugs (possession and attempted export) — accomplice evidence and requirement for corroboration — admissibility of co‑accused caution statements as witness evidence under s.175 — computer‑generated call logs and witness competence/authentication.
|
23 December 2022 |
|
|
9 December 2022 |
|
Court confirmed defilement conviction and increased sentence to 40 years due to breach of trust, threats, and HIV transmission.
Criminal law — Defilement: elements and proof; identification evidence; medical corroboration not essential but supportive; sentencing — aggravating factors (breach of trust, threats, HIV transmission) justify substantial enhancement.
|
6 December 2022 |
|
Conviction for defilement upheld and sentence enhanced to 40 years due to serious aggravating factors.
Criminal law – Defilement (s.138(1) Penal Code) – sufficiency of evidence and corroboration of child’s testimony – medical evidence not indispensable – sentencing enhancement – aggravating factors (young victim, planning, force, psychological harm) outweighing first‑offender mitigation.
|
6 December 2022 |
|
Court confirmed robbery convictions, upheld identification evidence, and enhanced custodial sentence to concurrent terms.
Robbery – identification evidence – Turnbull guidelines – confirmation of conviction – sentencing: aggravating factors (mask, group, violence, planning) outweighing youth and first-offender mitigation – sentence enhancement to concurrent terms.
|
6 December 2022 |
| November 2022 |
|
|
Court dismissed application to re-enter an appeal; dismissal for non-appearance cannot be revived and no sufficient cause was shown.
Civil procedure — dismissal for non-appearance — Order III r.21(2) — re-entry of appeal — sufficiency of cause — inherent jurisdiction — functus officio — delay and lack of diligence.
|
10 November 2022 |
| October 2022 |
|
|
Court held instruction fee payable once proceedings commenced, reduced fee and ordered revised costs payable within 14 days.
Costs — Instruction fee — Order 31 Rule 10 — Entitlement to instruction fee once proceedings commence in High Court even if no trial — Court's discretion to reduce quantum of fee.
|
30 October 2022 |
|
Court granted extension to file for judicial review, finding no prejudice or inordinate delay, deferring statutory time‑bar issues to substantive hearing.
Civil procedure – extension of time to seek judicial review – discretionary power under Order 19 r.20(6) – considerations: prejudice to respondent/public, detriment to good administration, and reasonableness of delay; Tax law – limitation/sunset clause (s.125 Taxation Act) raised but not decided at extension stage.
|
24 October 2022 |
|
Court awarded 10% of the judgment plus assessed disbursements, refusing refresher fees for lack of evidence of three‑hour sittings.
Costs — assessment under Subordinate Court Rules Order XXX r 2 and Second Schedule — 10% of judgment debt awarded — refresher fees require continuous court seating of three hours or more and proof — additional heads allowed: attendance, service, disbursements, secretarial, stationery — total assessed MK3,772,260.76.
|
12 October 2022 |
|
Assessment of quantum for unfair dismissal: salary base, mitigation, pension and severance, with a 50% devaluation uplift.
Labour law — assessment of damages for unfair dismissal — appropriate salary base (statutory salary vs overtime) — mitigation of loss — entitlement to statutory employer pension contributions — severance pay calculation — adjustment for currency devaluation — inadmissibility of unpleaded heads of damage.
|
10 October 2022 |
|
Assessment of compensation for unfair dismissal, applying mitigation, statutory minima and accepting uncontroverted applicant evidence.
Employment law – unfair dismissal – assessment of compensation – Section 63(4) & (5) Employment Act – mitigation of loss – severance pay – notice pay – withheld wages – effect of failure to call witnesses.
|
4 October 2022 |
| September 2022 |
|
|
Joinder of an insurer after the two‑year RTA limitation is time‑barred; insurer ordered to pay costs for raising the objection late.
Road Traffic Act s148 – Limitation of direct claims against insurers to two years; s148(1)(c) preserves only proceedings actually commenced against insurer within two years; late joinder of insurer time‑barred; mistake in insurer identity does not extend limitation period; discretion to award costs against successful but unreasonably late objector.
|
16 September 2022 |
|
Court reversed refusal to forfeit tainted timber, holding forfeiture discretionary, remedial, and not double punishment.
Criminal law — Forest Act s.68, s.74 — Forfeiture of tainted property — "May" denotes judicial discretion — Forfeiture remedial not punitive — Forfeiture may extend to foreign-sourced produce — Third‑party property requires hearing.
|
12 September 2022 |
| August 2022 |
|
|
|
16 August 2022 |
|
Ex parte permission and stay vacated because claimants lacked locus standi and materially misrepresented their status.
Judicial review — ex parte permission and interim relief — vacatur for lack of locus standi and material non-disclosure; Refugees Act — refugee status determination and effect of Minister's decision; scope of governmental relocation notice (rural v urban); costs awarded.
|
12 August 2022 |
|
Court refused review of cease-and-desist order due to temporary licence and prior notice, but allowed review of fine and accounts requirement.
Administrative law — Judicial review — Permission stage — Legitimate expectation — Temporary licence and competitive reassignment of spectrum — Reasons for administrative action — Interlocutory injunctions — Wednesbury unreasonableness.
|
12 August 2022 |
|
Viva-voce evidence can establish serious injury absent X‑rays; claimant awarded MK7,000,000 inclusive, costs to defendants.
Personal injury — proof of fracture — viva-voce evidence acceptable where X‑rays absent — hearsay limits on medical reports — assessment of quantum — comparability of awards.
|
1 August 2022 |
| July 2022 |
|
|
Cancellation of an industrial rebate without a hearing breached section 43, violated legitimate expectation, and was quashed.
Administrative law – section 43 Constitution – right to lawful and procedurally fair administrative action – legitimate expectation – right to be heard – cancellation of industrial rebate – customs regulations – Wednesbury unreasonableness – certiorari.
|
28 July 2022 |
|
Applicants proved entitlement to 18 months' unpaid salaries; court awarded amounts plus a 25% devaluation uplift, payable within 14 days.
Labour law – assessment of salary arrears after default judgment – burden and standard of proof in assessment proceedings – awarding currency devaluation uplift – proceeding in absentia where service proved.
|
25 July 2022 |
|
Default judgment set aside despite delay because judgment contained unpleaded monetary and leave awards and alleged improper service.
Civil procedure – setting aside default judgment – inordinate delay versus irregularity of judgment (unpleaded quantified awards, improper service) – court’s discretion to revoke judgment obtained by procedural failure.
|
25 July 2022 |
|
The applicant was awarded just and equitable compensation for unfair dismissal, statutory entitlements, and a 25% inflation uplift.
Employment law — unfair dismissal — assessment of compensation under Section 63(4)–(5) Employment Act — severance, gratuity, overtime, accrued leave, notice pay — burden and standard of proof — mitigation of loss — inflation/currency devaluation uplift.
|
25 July 2022 |
|
High Court enhanced a seven‑year robbery sentence to fourteen years due to being armed, in company, and causing injury.
Criminal law – Robbery – Sentence – Aggravating factors: armed with weapon, acting in company, use of personal violence – Enhancement of sentence on confirmation.
|
21 July 2022 |
|
Summary judgment refused because triable issues exist on contract formation and statutory exclusivity over land compensation.
Civil procedure – summary judgment – Order 12/Rule 26 CPR 17 – refusal where triable issues exist; Contract formation – signed agreement versus contract by conduct; Land Acquisition and Compensation Act s.9 – exclusive ministerial power over land acquisition and compensation; Document reliance – pleading requirements (Order 5 CPR 17).
|
18 July 2022 |
|
High Court confirmed unlawful wounding conviction and two‑year sentence despite defective plea‑taking, finding no prejudice to the accused.
Criminal procedure — Plea of guilt — adequacy of plea-taking and requirement to elicit lawful‑excuse element; conflicting caution statement versus prosecution facts; unlawful wounding — assessment of safety of conviction; sentencing — mitigation and confirmation of two‑year term.
|
18 July 2022 |
|
Permission for judicial review refused where applicant failed to establish an arguable, evidenced case of unlawful appointment or discrimination.
Judicial review — permission to apply; Appointment to the Supreme Court of Appeal (not promotion) — constitutional procedure; Alleged seniority practice — evidential requirement; Reasonableness/Wednesbury review of delay; Lawful consideration of gender balance and retirement/age; Need for arguable case to proceed to full hearing.
|
15 July 2022 |
|
High Court held it cannot re-open IRC factual findings and upheld summary dismissal for unexplained stock shortage.
Labour law – Appeal from Industrial Relations Court – High Court jurisdiction limited to questions of law or jurisdiction (s65 Labour Relations Act) – Findings of fact by IRC final and binding – Summary dismissal for unexplained stock shortage – Claim of subsequent overage not proved.
|
7 July 2022 |
| June 2022 |
|
|
Claimant failed to prove bus driver's negligence; collision held caused by truck driver veering to avoid a cyclist, claim dismissed.
'Negligence' – duty of care and breach; burden and standard of proof in civil cases; causation in road traffic collisions; res ipsa loquitur – inapplicable where claimant's evidence is inconsistent; submission of no case to answer in civil proceedings; costs—court's discretion.
|
27 June 2022 |
|
The claimant was awarded K7,028,000 for pain, loss of amenities, disfigurement and special damages after a road accident.
Personal injury — assessment of damages — fractures of tibia and fibula and facial bruising — non‑pecuniary heads: pain and suffering, loss of amenities, disfigurement — reliance on comparative awards — special damages for report costs — costs awarded.
|
24 June 2022 |
|
|
24 June 2022 |
|
Claimant awarded K7,000,000 for pain, loss of amenities and disfigurement from a workplace hand injury; special damages denied.
Personal injury — Workplace accident — Assessment of damages — Non-pecuniary damages: pain and suffering, loss of amenities, disfigurement — Quantum awarded K7,000,000 — Special damages not proved — Costs awarded.
|
24 June 2022 |
|
Court awarded K4,000,000 for death of an 11‑year‑old, using comparable awards and reasonable future probabilities for dependency.
Damages — Wrongful death of a child — Loss of expectation of life guided by comparable awards; Loss of dependency for non‑working child assessed by reasonable future probabilities (not multiplier–multiplicand).
|
24 June 2022 |
|
Assessment of non-pecuniary damages for three injured claimants; psychological effects not awarded without evidence.
Damages assessment — non-pecuniary losses (pain and suffering, loss of amenities, disfigurement) — need for evidence to prove psychological injury — awards to minors and trustee account for guardian access.
|
24 June 2022 |
|
No arguable appeal existed against tax assessments; statutory time and form requirements were not met, so judicial review and interlocutory relief were refused.
Tax law — judicial review — validity of appeal against tax assessment — strict compliance with statutory time limits and form for appeals under Value Added Tax Act, Taxation Act and Customs and Excise Act — enforcement (warrant of distress, embargo) where no valid appeal.
|
16 June 2022 |
|
Application to amend notice of appeal refused because proposed particulars would breach the rule requiring concise, non‑argumentative grounds.
Civil procedure — Amendment of notice of appeal — Order 111 rules 2(2) and 2(3) — Particulars of misdirection or error of law must be stated but grounds must remain concise and non‑argumentative — Application to add full particulars refused — Costs awarded.
|
15 June 2022 |
|
Summary judgment granted for claimant’s possession and rental claims where the uncontested will bequeathed the property and defendant had no arguable defence.
Succession law – validity and effect of will – beneficiary entitled to property; Summary judgment – no arguable defence; Possession and mesne profits; Executor/trustee status versus beneficiary rights; Matrimonial property claims irrelevant where property belongs to third‑party testator.
|
10 June 2022 |
|
Summary judgment for possession and mesne profits where the house was bequeathed under an uncontested will and defendant had no arguable defence.
Succession/estate law – testamentary bequest – property bequeathed under an uncontested will; Summary judgment – Order 12 – absence of arguable defence and no triable issue; Matrimonial property/contribution claims distinguished from testamentary rights; Possession and mesne profits (rentals) assessed by Registrar.
|
10 June 2022 |
| May 2022 |
|
|
An aggrieved party to proceedings cannot use Order 23 r.8 (CPR) to attack a consent order; appeal or a specific action is the proper remedy.
Civil procedure — Consent order — Variation or setting aside — Order 23 r.8 CPR applies to non‑parties directly affected, not to persons who are parties; remedy for a party aggrieved by a consent order is appeal or a specific action to set it aside — Application to strike terms of consent order dismissed as misconceived.
|
30 May 2022 |
|
Minister acted without statutory authority and breached right to fair administrative action; his decision and the lessor's action were quashed.
Administrative law — Judicial review — Ministerial powers under Statutory Bodies (Control of Contracts) Act — Scope of "contract" — Jurisdictional limit; Natural justice — Right to hearing and reasons — Section 43 Constitution; Invalidity and quashing of administrative decisions; Property rights affected by administrative action.
|
26 May 2022 |
|
Assessment of personal injury damages: separate awards for pain, loss of amenities, disfigurement; hearsay objection not entertained.
Personal injury — assessment of damages — heads: pain and suffering, loss of amenities, disfigurement — hearsay objection at quantum stage — separate assessment of damage heads.
|
20 May 2022 |
|
Registrar awards K4,231,400 costs including K1,000,000 instruction fee and declines to decide insurer's liability for costs due to lack of jurisdiction.
Civil procedure – assessment of party-and-party costs – instruction fees payable under Order 31 rule 10(1) – assessment amount set – registrar lacks jurisdiction to interpret or vary a judge’s prior order as to insurer’s liability for costs.
|
11 May 2022 |
| April 2022 |
|
|
Confirmation court increased sentence for aggravated robbery due to weapon use, multiple assailants, and serious wounds.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – Sentencing – Use of dangerous weapon and acting in company – Wounding – Confirmation proceedings – Court may increase an inadequate sentence.
|
26 April 2022 |
|
Court set aside provisional interlocutory injunction and declared documents filed by an unlicensed practitioner nullity.
Legal practice licence — Legal Education and Legal Practitioners Act — validity of documents filed by an unlicensed practitioner — nullity of steps — interlocutory injunction criteria (serious question, inadequacy of damages, balance of convenience) — inherent jurisdiction — referral for disciplinary action.
|
21 April 2022 |
|
Oversight or negligence by counsel does not justify setting aside a default judgment absent leave to file out of time.
Default judgment – Application to set aside – Service admitted – Failure to file defence within prescribed time – Oversight/negligence by counsel insufficient – No application for leave to file out of time – Assessment of damages ordered.
|
19 April 2022 |
|
Assessment of unfair dismissal, overtime and severance; court applied Employment Act principles and awarded specified sums.
Employment law – unfair dismissal – assessment of compensation under s63(4)–(5) Employment Act – overtime pay under s39 – severance under s35 – mitigation of loss – deduction of prior payments.
|
19 April 2022 |
|
Application to set aside default judgment refused for inordinate delay; matter to proceed to damages assessment.
Civil procedure – Setting aside default judgment – Inordinate delay – Service on legal representative – Alleged missing court file – Negligence of counsel does not excuse prejudice to the opposing party.
|
19 April 2022 |
|
Application to set aside default judgment refused for inordinate delay and inadequate justification for non-attendance.
Civil procedure — setting aside default judgment — inordinate delay — service on legal representatives — negligence of counsel and missing court file — restoration of struck-out defence.
|
19 April 2022 |
|
Procedurally defective late appeal dismissed; lower court's property and maintenance orders upheld; variation must be sought in lower court.
Civil procedure – appeal from subordinate court – requirement for notice of appeal and leave to appeal out of time; Matrimonial property – distribution of matrimonial home; Maintenance – arrears, contempt and variation procedure under Child Care Protection and Justice Act.
|
13 April 2022 |
|
Eyewitness evidence established driver negligence; owner and insurer vicariously liable, police report disregarded for lack of author’s testimony.
Motor vehicle negligence – duty of care of driver – credibility of eyewitness evidence – balance of probabilities – vicarious liability of owner and insurer – inadmissibility/weight of police report where author absent – contributory negligence pleaded.
|
6 April 2022 |
|
The Ombudsman acted beyond jurisdiction by investigating a dispute involving a private company despite reasonably available court remedies.
Ombudsman jurisdiction – constitutional limits under section 123(1) – reasonably available remedy by court – Ombudsman Act and section 124: investigatory powers limited to public bodies – inquiry into private entity exceeds jurisdiction – judicial review of administrative action.
|
1 April 2022 |
| March 2022 |
|
|
Appeal allowed where magistrate awarded compensation for land encroachment without hearing parties on appropriate remedy; matter remitted.
Land law — Encroachment — Remedy — Award of compensation — Exercise of judicial discretion — Duty to hear parties on remedy (audi alteram partem) — Remittal to magistrate.
|
22 March 2022 |