|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| November 1993 |
|
|
Plaintiff may recover substitute vehicle hire costs incurred during repairs caused by the defendant’s negligence.
Negligence — consequential loss to chattels — recoverability of substitute hire costs — third‑party payments and obligations — credibility of hiring evidence.
|
29 November 1993 |
|
A defendant’s prima facie defence based on rejection and redelivery of goods can justify setting aside a default judgment.
Civil procedure — setting aside default judgment; service and computation of time; statement of claim not required for liquidated claims where writ sufficiently states claim; contract — rejection and redelivery of goods, mitigation and measure of damages; prima facie defence warrants setting aside default judgment.
|
15 November 1993 |
|
Plaintiff awarded K2,800 for unpaid allowance, conversion of goods, and defamation following defendant's default.
Employment — unpaid professional/responsibility allowance; Conversion and trespass to goods — measure of damages (cost at time of conversion); Defamation — damages for injury to credit and reputation; Default judgment — assessment of damages in absence of defendant.
|
13 November 1993 |
|
A registrar may grant an ex parte stay of execution and impose instalment payment conditions under Order 47 r.1.
Civil procedure – Order 47 r.1 – Stay of execution – Application after instalment order – Registrar’s jurisdiction to grant ex parte stay and impose conditions – inability to pay.
|
12 November 1993 |
|
The respondent driver failed to yield at a give-way and was negligent; the applicant recovered damages and costs.
Road traffic — intersection governed by give-way signs — duty to yield and take proper lookout — credibility of independent witness — negligent pull-out causing collision — contributory negligence de minimis — damages for hire of replacement vehicles.
|
4 November 1993 |
|
An ex parte dismissal was set aside and the action restored where security for costs had been paid into court and the dismissal could be reconsidered under Order 32 r.6.
Civil procedure — Security for costs — Payment into court — No rule requiring notification to opposing party — Ex parte dismissal — Order 32 r.6: setting aside on proof of new facts or for justice — Restoration of action.
|
3 November 1993 |