Results.
6 judgments found.
|
|
|
| December 2005 |
|
|
Ex parte leave for judicial review obtained by deported refugees was void for material non‑disclosure and lack of locus standi.
-
Refugee Law — Expulsion — Deportation for national security or public order — Application of Article 32 of the 1951 Refugee Convention
-
Civil Procedure
-
—
Judicial review (ex parte) — Duty of full and frank disclosure — Material non‑disclosure vitiates leave
-
—
Interlocutory injunction — Impossibility of performance and locus standi — Application of American Cyanamid principles
|
28 December 2005 |
|
No binding contract where purchaser’s order constituted a counter‑offer varying payment and delivery terms.
-
Contract Law
-
—
Formation — Whether a binding contract existed — Counter‑offer v Acceptance — Objective test
-
—
Remedies — Specific Performance — Unavailable where no concluded contract
|
13 December 2005 |
|
A bailee-defendant is liable where exclusion clause, illegality and contributory negligence defences are unproven.
-
Contract Law — Bailment — Bailee for reward's duty of care and onus to prove loss without negligence
-
Tort — Negligence — Contributory negligence — Defendant must prove contributory fault by direct evidence
-
Evidence/Statutory Law — Illegality and capacity to contract — Statutory breach does not void contract absent clear statutory provision or when it does not go to the root of the contract
|
5 December 2005 |
|
Owner liable only for current water bill where water boards fail to disconnect after occupier’s non-payment beyond 30 days.
-
Water Law — Rates and Charges — Liability of occupier first then owner; effect of bye-laws and disconnection practice
-
Municipal Law — Enforcement — Disconnection for non-payment — Discretionary power and consequences of non-enforcement
|
1 December 2005 |
|
Court upheld consolidation of winding‑up petitions due to overlapping legal and equitable issues, including alleged malice.
-
Company Law —
Winding‑up
-
—
Consolidation of petitions — Procedure under Order 4 Rule 9
-
—
Legal remedy with overlapping equitable issues — Effect on consolidation
-
Civil Procedure — Affidavit evidence — Unchallenged allegations of malice — Relevance to joinder/consolidation
|
1 December 2005 |
|
Forfeiture under s159(1) is automatic; duty paid on forfeited goods must be refunded.
-
Customs Law
-
—
Forfeiture — Automatic forfeiture of seized goods upon conviction under s 159(1) — No judicial discretion
-
—
Duty on Forfeited Goods — Whether duty paid by convict may be retained when goods are forfeited and realised — Interaction of s 159(1) and s 159(2)
|
1 December 2005 |