High Court of Malawi - 1996

18 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
18 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 1996
A conviction based on an equivocal guilty plea and bare facts for receiving stolen property was unsafe and quashed.
Criminal law – receiving stolen property – plea of guilty must be supported by unequivocal facts – accused’s knowledge or reason to suspect – accused’s understanding of plea (illiteracy) – unsafe conviction quashed.
30 December 1996
Whether eligible but unregistered voters may obtain interlocutory relief to halt a by-election until registration disputes are adjudicated.
Constitutional and electoral law – right to registration and to vote – interlocutory relief – application of American Cyanamid principles – adequacy of damages – balance of convenience in election disputes.
9 December 1996
November 1996
20 November 1996
October 1996
Age and first‑offender status do not preclude custodial sentences for serious housebreaking; the imposed imprisonment was confirmed.
Criminal law – Housebreaking and theft – Seriousness of burglary offences – Age and first‑offender status not by themselves grounds for non‑custodial sentence or suspension – Sentencing confirmed
31 October 1996
March 1996
Appeal allowed where identification parade was defective, pre-parade exposure occurred, and visibility was poor.
Identification evidence – Defective identification parade (conducted by investigating constable) – Pre-parade viewing/suggestiveness – Poor visibility at dawn – Lack of descriptive particulars – Identification evidence unsafe
29 March 1996
High Court confirmed concurrent sentences but found them inadequate, affirmed DPP's right to appeal sentencing on questions of law.
Sentencing — Breaking into building (s311 Penal Code) — Adequacy of sentence; starting point three years — Multiple offences as aggravation — DPP right to appeal on question of law (s346 Criminal Procedure and Evidence Code) — Delay in review process undermining remedy
5 March 1996
February 1996
Convictions for cheating set aside where borrowed items were not returned but no evidence of trick or device existed.
Criminal law – Cheating (s.321 Penal Code) – Requirement of a trick or device – Borrowed goods not returned does not constitute cheating absent evidence of deception
29 February 1996
Unspecified "intimidation" did not satisfy robbery-with-violence requirements; conviction substituted to theft and sentence adjusted.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – statutory requirement of actual violence or threat of actual violence – allegation of "intimidation" insufficiently particularised – conviction substituted to theft from a person (s278 read with s282(a) Penal Code) – sentence varied on review
22 February 1996
Section 329 conviction unsustainable where accused lacked possession at time of charge; past sale does not attract liability.
Criminal law – Possession – Section 329 Penal Code – Requires contemporaneous possession when charged; past possession insufficient for conviction
22 February 1996
Plaintiff entitled to recover taxed costs from a successful co‑defendant; K24,913.70 awarded.
Civil procedure — Costs — Taxed costs — Entitlement to recover taxed bill from a successful co-defendant — Authority: Bullock v London General Omnibus Co. (1907) KB 264.
15 February 1996
Robbery conviction quashed where no violence or threat to obtain/retain property; convicted of theft and sentenced to three years.
Criminal law – Robbery – Elements of robbery require violence or threat to obtain or retain property – Subsequent assault unrelated to retention cannot support robbery; substitution to theft from a person and sentence reduction
14 February 1996
Assessment of personal injury damages, hearsay inadmissibility of medical reports, rejection of vehicle claim due to discharge.
Damages for personal injury – distinction between pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses – assessment by comparison and adjustment for local economic conditions; admissibility of medical reports – hearsay unless doctor called; proof required for special damages; discharge as bar to vehicle claim; interest and exemplary damages not recoverable.
13 February 1996
January 1996
A first-time theft offender should not be denied suspension merely because the offence is commonplace or crime has increased.
Sentencing — suspension of sentence under s.340 — first offenders — commonplaceness of offence not sufficient to refuse suspension — distinction between sentencing purposes and principles — upsurge in crime addressed by sentence severity, not denial of suspension
31 January 1996
Court increased the respondent's burglary sentence to three years, finding two years inadequate to deter crime.
Criminal law – Burglary and housebreaking – Sentencing principles – Starting points for repeat offenders (5–6 years) – Mitigating factors reduce sentences – Public interest and deterrence may justify enhancement on review – Concurrent sentences
29 January 1996
A nine-month sentence for stealing one oxcart tyre was manifestly excessive and required suspension and release.
Sentencing — Theft (low-value property) — Proportionality of sentence — Mitigating factors (youth, first offender) — Joint commission not automatically aggravating — Suspension of sentence
29 January 1996
Five-year sentence for armed, concerted rape confirmed; sentencing reasons required and guilty plea warranted only modest mitigation.
Criminal law – Rape – Sentencing – Requirement for sentencing reasons – Weight of mitigation (youth, first offender, guilty plea) – Aggravating factors (armed, in concert, assault, humiliation) – Confirmation on review
24 January 1996
A court cannot impose disparate sentences based on untested co-defendants' statements without giving the defendant a chance to respond.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Disparate sentences – Degree of participation – Reliance on co-defendants' or police statements – Plea of guilty requires opportunity for accused to present version – Caution with self-serving statements (R v Smith)
24 January 1996
Appeal dismissed: arrest injuries and guilty plea insufficient to outweigh aggravating group violence and injury to victim.
Criminal law – breaking into building and committing felony – sentence – mitigating factors – injury during arrest – guilty plea reduction – starting point three years – aggravation by group, violence and injury – appeal dismissed
11 January 1996