Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
High Court of Malawi
High Court of Malawi - 2005 October
2 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Blantyre Principal Registry
Lilongwe District Criminal Registry
Lilongwe District Registry
Lilongwe District Registry - Financial Crimes Division
Principal Registry
Zomba District Registry
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
Months
Skip past months
All months
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Browse by month
All months
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Mkandawire J
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 2 judgments found.
2 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
October 2005
Kanjerwa v Dzinyemba t/a Tirza Enterprises (Civil Cause 686 of 2001) [2005] MWHC 131 (25 October 2005)
A predominantly labour dispute should generally be transferred to the Industrial Relations Court after case-by-case assessment.
Jurisdiction — High Court v Industrial Relations Court — transfer of labour disputes; Labour Relations Act s64; case-by-case guidelines for transfer; ancillary non-labour claims do not preclude transfer.
25 October 2005
Jumbe & Anor. v Attorney General (1 of 2005; 2 of 2005) [2005] MWHC 15 (20 October 2005)
A statutory reverse‑onus presumption was held (majority) to violate the accused’s constitutional presumption of innocence and right to silence.
Constitutional Law
— Criminal Procedure — Reverse onus presumption and burden of proof — Whether statutory presumption infringes presumption of innocence and right to remain silent
— Limitations on rights — Justification under s.44(2)–(3) — Requirement of evidence, rational connection, proportionality and non‑negation of essential content
Criminal Law — Corruption offences — Proof of mens rea and legislative use of presumptions — Legitimate objective versus unacceptable reversal of onus
20 October 2005
1
Current page, page 1
>