|
Applicant argues customs provisions reversing burden of proof violate the constitutional presumption of innocence and fair‑trial rights.
Constitutional law — Criminal procedure — Reverse onus provisions in customs legislation — Presumption of innocence and right to remain silent — Burden of proof shifted to accused — Admissibility of foreign certificates and prima facie evidence — Limitation test under s44 (reasonableness, necessity, international standards) — Invalidation under s5 and remedies under ss46/200.
|