|
Court finds transaction was hire-purchase, orders refund, damages, and removal of restrictive endorsement; repossession wrongful.
Hire-purchase v lease-hire — true nature of transaction determined by parol evidence and contemporaneous documents; repossession under Hire Purchase Act s.19(1) — wrongful repossession and detention; overcharge of finance charge — refund; ownership and removal of restrictive endorsement; damages for alternative transport and lost rebate.
|