Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal
Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal - 2022 June
2 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Principal Registry
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1989
1988
1986
1981
1979
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1989
1988
1986
1981
1979
Months
Skip past months
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Browse by month
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Chikopa JA
I.C. Kamanga JA
Kapanda JA
Katsala JA
Mkandawire JA
Mzikamanda JA
Potani JA
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 2 judgments found.
2 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
June 2022
Denvar v Strabag International (Civil Appeal 2 of 2022) [2022] MWSC 15 (30 June 2022)
The applicant’s claim failed: racist insults about driving were offensive but not legally defamatory; appeal dismissed.
Defamation — ordinary and ordinary‑meaning test; whether insulting/racial remarks constitute defamatory imputation of character or mere abuse; requirement of proof of reputational harm; vicarious liability — scope of employment not determined where no defamation established.
30 June 2022
Malawi Housing Corporation v Nyirenda (Civil Appeal 26 of 2021) [2022] MWSC 8 (14 June 2022)
Bureaucracy or absent counsel do not justify extending time to appeal; applicant must show substantial reasons and prima facie meritorious grounds.
Civil procedure — Extension of time to appeal — applicant must show good and substantial reasons for delay and prima facie meritorious grounds; internal bureaucracy or absent counsel insufficient; compliance with Order III rules on Notice and grounds of appeal; summary judgment challenges.
14 June 2022
1
Current page, page 1
>