Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal - 2010 November

4 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
4 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
November 2010
Where allegations are serious and accounts conflict, employers must afford an employee a meaningful hearing, often an oral one with opportunity to confront witnesses.
Employment law – Right to be heard – Section 57(2) Employment Act – Oral hearing not always required but necessary where allegations are serious and evidence is contradictory – Opportunity to confront and cross-examine witnesses – Procedural unfairness and unfair dismissal.
24 November 2010
Whether dismissal for alleged theft was fair despite the accuser not being called at the disciplinary hearing.
Employment law — dismissal for theft — corroborative documentary evidence (meter readings) — procedural fairness and right to confront accuser — section 59(1)(a) summary dismissal — section 61(2) equity.
11 November 2010
Fresh evidence proving company’s public status admitted on appeal where necessary for justice and where counsel misled the trial court.
Fresh evidence on appeal – Order III r.24 – two limbs (broad discretion for furtherance of justice; narrower post-decision facts limb) – relationship to Ladd v Marshall – admissibility of company documents filed with Registrar – effect of counsel’s misleading conduct
10 November 2010
Possession gives locus standi in trespass; trespass and assault upheld, but damages substantially reduced on appeal.
Company law — separate legal personality; Possession as locus standi in trespass; Trespass to land — unauthorised interference with possession; Public right of way defence — requirement to plead and prove; Assault — liability of agents/employees; Appellate review of damages — re-assessment where award is manifestly excessive.
3 November 2010