Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal
Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal - 2003 April
2 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Principal Registry
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1989
1988
1986
1981
1979
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1989
1988
1986
1981
1979
Months
Skip past months
All months
March
April
August
October
December
Browse by month
All months
March
April
August
October
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Banda CJ
Tambala JA
Unyolo JA
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Most cited
Filter
Results. 2 judgments found.
2 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
April 2003
Tembo (JZU) & Anor. v Speaker of National Assembly (MSCA Civil Appeal 1 of 2003) [2003] MWSC 2 (27 April 2003)
Speaker is not the proper defendant in judicial review of parliamentary acts; Attorney General is, and injunctions against Government are prohibited.
Administrative law — Judicial review of parliamentary decision — Speaker not proper party; Attorney General proper respondent — Civil Procedure (Suits by or against Government) Act requires notice and bars injunctions against Government — procedural defect of wrong party may defeat interlocutory relief — right to review Parliamentary compliance with natural justice
27 April 2003
Jeffrey v Phiri and Another (MSCA Civil Appeal 12 of 2002) [2003] MWSC 6 (16 April 2003)
Seizure and freezing orders under CPA s32(5) are civil preservatory measures; ex parte relief is permissible with later inter partes safeguards.
Corrupt Practices Act s32(5) — seizure and freezing orders; civil ex parte applications; duty of full and frank disclosure; preservation of assets pending trial; property rights and constitutional limitation; tracing/segregation of assets; unclean hands; no statutory receivership under CPA.
16 April 2003
1
Current page, page 1
>