Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal
Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal - 2000 August
2 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Principal Registry
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1989
1988
1986
1981
1979
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1989
1988
1986
1981
1979
Months
Skip past months
All months
April
August
October
Browse by month
All months
April
August
October
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Most cited
Filter
Results. 2 judgments found.
2 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
August 2000
Press Farming Ltd v Issat & Ors. (MSCA Civil Appeal 1 of 1997) [2000] MWSC 4 (24 August 2000)
Appeal allowed: respondents failed to prove false imprisonment or slander; aggravated damages require specific pleading.
Tort — False imprisonment: liability where defendant or agent makes a charge procuring police arrest; distinction between laying information and making a charge; burden of proof on claimant
Defamation — necessity of proving the words as pleaded
Damages — special and aggravated damages must be specifically pleaded with particulars
24 August 2000
R v Chimwala (MSCA Criminal Appeal 5 of 2000) [2000] MWSC 3 (14 August 2000)
Insufficient Turnbull warning was outweighed by fingerprint and caution-statement corroboration, so conviction was upheld.
Criminal law — Visual identification — Dock identification — Turnbull warning required; Fingerprint evidence as corroboration; Caution statement; Safety of verdict; Missing exhibits explained
14 August 2000
1
Current page, page 1
>