Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
High Court of Malawi
High Court of Malawi - 2011 February
3 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Blantyre Principal Registry
Lilongwe District Criminal Registry
Lilongwe District Registry
Lilongwe District Registry - Financial Crimes Division
Principal Registry
Zomba District Registry
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
Months
Skip past months
All months
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
Browse by month
All months
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 3 judgments found.
3 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
February 2011
R v Mwaungulu (37 of 2010) [2011] MWHC 1 (20 February 2011)
Conviction for burglary and theft quashed where circumstantial evidence failed to prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law — Burglary and theft (s311) — Circumstantial evidence — Identity of accused — Burden and standard of proof — Conviction unsafe where chain of circumstances does not exclude reasonable hypotheses of innocence.
20 February 2011
R v Manda (21 of 2010) [2011] MWHC 2 (16 February 2011)
Unsworn child testimony needs independent corroboration; medical and adult evidence can validate a defilement conviction.
Criminal law — Defilement — Elements: penetration, victim under 13, accused’s knowledge; Unsworn child testimony requires independent corroboration; Two minors’ unsworn statements cannot corroborate each other; Corroboration may be provided by adult eyewitnesses and medical evidence; Circumstantial evidence must exclude reasonable hypotheses of innocence.
16 February 2011
Ex -parte Muluzi (3 of 2011) [2011] MWHC 3 (9 February 2011)
Whether government may condition a former president's statutory right to free medical treatment abroad on a local referral procedure.
:[
9 February 2011
1
Current page, page 1
>