Results.
66 documents found.
|
|
|
|
|
Whether the applicant is entitled to continue an interlocutory injunction despite a one-day late filing and alleged non-disclosure and stamping issues.
-
Interlocutory injunctions — Order 10 Rule 27 (CPR 2017) — American Cyanamid principles — serious question to be tried; adequacy of damages; preservation of status quo — CPR Order 2 cure of irregularity — duty of full and frank disclosure for ex parte relief — equity and unclean hands — effect of unstamped agreements where party treats contract as operative.
|
|
Judgment |
21 November 2025 |
|
High Court set aside committal for extradition due to procedural unfairness, evidentiary defects, improper authentication, and safety concerns for applicants.
-
Extradition — procedural fairness — right to be heard; adequacy of judicial reasons; authentication of extradition documents; hearsay and admissibility; linkage between ATP, warrants and charges; specialty and statutory compliance; consideration of safety, delay and bad faith.
|
|
Judgment |
31 October 2025 |
|
A raped minor’s denial of abortion breached reproductive rights; law and guidelines require considering mental-health grounds for termination.
-
Gender Equality Act — right to sexual and reproductive health; Penal Code s243 — preservation of life includes mental health; vicarious liability of employer; duty to impart information; Minister’s duty to provide clear clinical guidance; Human Rights Commission enforcement obligations; access to lawful abortion for minors impregnated by sexual violence.
|
|
Judgment |
28 October 2025 |
|
Leave for judicial review dismissed for deficient drafting, but applicant granted liberty to refile with notice to respondent.
-
Judicial review — leave to apply — procedural and drafting deficiencies (typos, wrong citations, unclear arguments) — Order 19 CPR — dismissal with liberty to refile — notice to respondent.
|
|
Judgment |
22 September 2025 |
|
Chief Justice certifies the whole proceeding as constitutional; certification is a judicial, conclusive act not amenable to review or appeal.
-
Certification under s.9(2) Courts Act — Chief Justice certifies the whole original proceeding; Certification is judicial, conclusive and transforms the case into a constitutional matter; Party-commenced certification ordinarily commenced by summons under CPR Order 19 (service and response required); Alleged procedural irregularities in certification are to be addressed to the Chief Justice (Order 2 Rule 3(a)), not by judicial review or appeal.
|
|
Judgment |
2 September 2025 |
|
Court refused challenge to Acting Director’s authority, stayed 24‑hour production requirement, and granted review permission on campaign speech vs ACB investigatory powers.
-
Administrative law — judicial review; Actings appointments — authority of Deputy Director to act as Director; Anti‑Corruption Bureau powers — s.10–11 Corrupt Practices Act; Electoral law — freedom of expression during campaign (constitutional s.35 and Elections Act s.53–55); Reasonableness of statutory document production timelines; Interim stay to protect campaign speech.
|
|
Judgment |
31 August 2025 |
|
Claimant lacked a cognisable right and sufficient interest to seek judicial review of the appointment; application dismissed and costs awarded.
-
Judicial review — permission stage — Order 19 rule 20 requirements — must show a right, interest or legitimate expectation affected and sufficient locus standi; speculative future grievances non-justiciable; interlocutory injunction falls away where permission denied; costs follow the event.
|
|
Judgment |
20 August 2025 |
|
|
|
Judgment |
18 August 2025 |
|
|
|
Judgment |
18 August 2025 |
|
|
|
Judgment |
11 August 2025 |
|
Court declared multiple constitutional breaches in a detained child’s treatment and ordered declarations, mandamus, compensation and costs.
-
Constitutional and child-protection law — detention of children — torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment — right to be informed of rights on arrest — prompt notification of parent/guardian — separation from adult offenders — right to nutrition — entitlement to compensation and mandamus relief.
|
|
Judgment |
19 June 2025 |
|
The respondent's application for leave to appeal was denied because the High Court's review judgment remained inchoate pending assessment of terminal dues.
-
Administrative law — Appeals — Leave required for appeals from High Court judgments given on review under s123(2) of the Constitution and s21 of the Supreme Court of Appeal Act; inchoate judgments pending Registrar’s assessment; Ombudsman jurisdiction — anonymous complaints and locus standi; interpretation of constitutional provisions and binding precedent.
|
|
Judgment |
22 May 2025 |
|
Judicial review of the DPP’s prosecutorial decisions is exceptional; applicants must first exhaust parliamentary and criminal remedies.
-
Prosecutorial discretion — Judicial review leave — Selective prosecution alleged — Requirement to exhaust parliamentary oversight (Legal Affairs Committee) — Exceptional circumstances threshold (dishonesty/mala fides) — Prematurity and abuse of civil process to challenge criminal proceedings.
|
|
Judgment |
28 April 2025 |
|
The employer's appeal against compensation for the respondent's constructive dismissal was dismissed; s63 discretion upheld.
-
Employment law — Unfair/constructive dismissal — Assessment of compensation — Sections 63(4) and 63(5) Employment Act — Immediate loss and future loss — Pleading standards in Industrial Relations Court — Statutory severance allowance (s35).
|
|
Judgment |
4 April 2025 |
|
Oral preliminary objections are procedurally improper; such issues must be raised by formal application supported by affidavit.
-
Civil procedure — preliminary issues — must be raised by formal application supported by affidavit and skeleton arguments — oral preliminary objections improper — viva voce evidence from counsel inappropriate — improperly raised issue struck out with liberty to refile.
|
|
Judgment |
25 March 2025 |
|
Registrar’s total non-response to information requests on political party funding was unlawful and required written explanation; fee non-payment alone did not justify silence.
-
Access to information — political party funding — duty of Registrar to respond — constitutional right of access (s.37) — Political Parties Act s.36 — subsidiary fees and competence of requests — absence of regulations — judicial review of administrative non-response.
|
|
Judgment |
12 March 2025 |
|
Leave for judicial review of a Law Society disciplinary process was discharged as premature; disciplinary self-regulation aligns with procedural-fairness rights.
-
Administrative law — judicial review — permission to commence — prematurity of review before disciplinary hearing; Legal profession — self-regulation and disciplinary jurisdiction; Constitutional law — section 43 right to procedurally fair administrative action; Professional ethics — personal conduct on social media as conduct bringing profession into discredit.
|
|
Judgment |
11 March 2025 |
|
Ex parte freezing injunction vacated after applicant suppressed material related‑party and forensic‑audit facts.
-
Civil procedure — freezing injunctions — Order 10 r.11, r.12(2)(b) CPR — requirements: good and arguable case, assets likely to form part of judgment, risk of dissipation — equitable relief requires full and frank disclosure — clean hands doctrine — proportionality of freezing orders — relevance of forensic audit and related-party conflicts.
|
|
Judgment |
7 February 2025 |
|
Failure to serve the mandatory pre‑suit notice and the time‑barred nature of the dispute rendered the applicants’ claim and motion a nullity.
-
Civil procedure — pre‑suit notice mandatory under Civil Procedure (Suits By and Against Government) Act s4 — non‑compliance renders action a nullity; administrative law — challenges to Ministerial implementation of statutory pension scheme are matters for judicial review; limitation — three‑month rule for judicial review; declaratory relief cannot circumvent pre‑suit notice requirement.
|
|
Judgment |
3 February 2025 |
|
Dismissals for operational requirements without consultation were unfair; applicants entitled to compensation.
-
Employment law — unfair dismissal — operational requirements/retrenchment — statutory consultation requirement — justice and equity (s.61 Employment Act) — funding contingency clause — contractual notice period — compensation assessment.
|
|
Judgment |
3 February 2025 |
|
Ex parte permission for judicial review discharged for abuse of process and suppression of prior related proceedings.
-
Administrative law — Judicial review — Ex parte permission — Duty of frank and full disclosure — Suppression of prior related proceedings — Abuse of court process via multiplicity of actions — Discharge of permission and interlocutory injunction — Discretionary extension of time (functus officio).
|
|
Judgment |
31 January 2025 |
|
The Ombudsman lacked jurisdiction to investigate an anonymous complaint; resulting employment nullifications were set aside and benefits ordered.
-
Ombudsman jurisdiction — section 123(1) Constitution — anonymous complaints — requirement that a person who has suffered injustice lay complaint; judicial review of Ombudsman determinations; nullity of unlawful directives; compliance by public authority; reinstatement and terminal benefits; costs each party.
|
|
Judgment |
31 January 2025 |
|
|
|
Document |
24 January 2025 |
|
Leave to appeal and a stay were dismissed as premature and procedurally incompetent because the High Court judgment remained inchoate.
-
Civil procedure — inchoate judgment — premature leave to appeal — inchoate judgments not appealable; stay of execution — must first apply to High Court where concurrent jurisdiction exists; SCA jurisdiction invoked after refusal by High Court; procedural competency of applications.
|
|
Judgment |
22 January 2025 |
|
High Court reviewed and set aside subordinate custody order, awarding primary custody to the breastfeeding mother and ordering medical and social assessments.
-
Family law — Custody — Best interests of the child — Infant breastfeeding as paramount consideration — High Court supervisory review under Section 26 Courts Act — Quashing subordinate court custody order — Orders for medical and social welfare assessments.
|
|
Judgment |
22 January 2025 |
|
Registrar rejects application for review due to improper signature, procedural non-compliance, and wrong forum for admissions.
-
Civil procedure — rejection of documents; signature by named legal practitioner required; notice of change of legal practitioner (Order 33); sworn statement formalities (Order 18); jurisdiction for admissions — Chief Justice; abuse of court process; Rules Orders 5, 18, 25.
|
|
Judgment |
22 January 2025 |
|
Unexplained division of matrimonial property set aside and remitted for rehearing due to lack of reasons and analysis.
-
Matrimonial property distribution — duty to give reasons — assessment of contributions and parties' intentions — improper delegation to Registrar — remittal for rehearing.
|
|
Judgment |
17 December 2024 |
|
Section 96(1) does not make lodging a complaint and cyber‑inspector assessment a mandatory precondition to prosecuting offences under the Act.
-
Electronic Transactions and Cyber Security Act — Section 96(1) — "may" versus "shall" — permissive complaint procedure — role and powers of cyber inspector — whether complaint/assessment is mandatory precondition to prosecution — effect of non‑compliance on validity of charges.
|
|
Judgment |
17 December 2024 |
|
Leave to appeal denied to avoid piecemeal, inchoate appeals and to expedite resolution of child custody and relocation issues.
-
Appeal — leave to appeal — requirement under s.21 Supreme Court of Appeal Act; Inchoate appeals — prohibition on piecemeal appeals; Case management — expediency in child custody disputes; Jurisdiction — relocation application to Chief Resident Magistrate (Centre); Costs — each party to bear own costs.
|
|
Judgment |
29 November 2024 |
|
Appeal dismissed for inordinate delay and failure to prosecute; missing-file excuse was unsubstantiated hearsay.
-
Civil procedure — dismissal for want of prosecution — Order III r.9 (record of appeal) — Practice Direction No 1 of 2010 (skeleton arguments) — missing court file allegation — hearsay — failure to prosecute — costs.
|
|
Judgment |
29 November 2024 |
|
High Court set aside magistrate’s judgment for lack of jurisdiction and ordered respondents to repay sums obtained; costs ordered against respondents’ counsel.
-
Civil procedure — Jurisdiction of subordinate courts — Cause of action arising in another district — Proceedings and judgments without jurisdiction are null and void — High Court power to set aside subordinate court judgments — Third-party debt/attachment orders — Costs and remedies against counsel.
|
|
Judgment |
21 November 2024 |
|
Whether seized foreign currency should be forfeited where a businessperson hid funds and used a fake receipt, outweighing mitigating circumstances.
-
Exchange control — Regulation 36(1) discretionary forfeiture of foreign currency — judicial exercise of discretion — aggravating factors (large sum, concealment, forged receipt, business person) v. mitigating factors (first offender, plea, alleged hardship) — precedents: Kamanga; Zheng Yan; Henry Kopa; Ashraf Bdallal El Ali — requirement to hear accused in opposition to forfeiture.
|
|
Judgment |
20 November 2024 |
|
High Court set aside arbitrarily imposed fines for forestry offences, requiring means test and reducing custodial sentences.
-
Forestry offences — sentencing — fines and default imprisonment — mandatory means test — application of Fines (Conversions) Act — first offender principles — s340(1) Criminal Procedure and Evidence Code — supervisory confirmation review.
|
|
Judgment |
19 November 2024 |
|
|
|
Judgment |
6 November 2024 |
|
Employer breached its redundancy policy and failed to meaningfully consult, rendering the dismissal unfair and attracting compensation.
-
Employment law — redundancy and retrenchment — s.57(1) Employment Act — duty to consult where employer’s terms/policy require it — relevance of ILO Termination of Employment Convention No.158 and Ministry of Labour guidelines — procedural fairness, meaningful consultation and use of proper evidence — unfair dismissal and compensation.
|
|
Judgment |
1 November 2024 |
|
Registrar rejected duplicate originating proceedings as an abuse of process and improper filing at the wrong registry.
-
Registrar's power to reject documents — abuse of court process by duplicative filings (summons and judicial review) — improper forum/registry — Order 5 rules 10–13; Order 6 r9; Courts Act s3 and s6A(2).
|
|
Judgment |
27 October 2024 |
|
Application to file supplementary skeleton arguments deferred to the full bench; copies to be supplied by deadline or dismissed.
-
Civil procedure — interlocutory application for leave to file supplementary skeleton arguments — judicial discretion — timing and service of filings — appropriateness of single-member determination where appeal listed before full bench — procedural directions and automatic dismissal for non-compliance.
|
|
Judgment |
24 October 2024 |
|
The court ceased jurisdiction after referral to arbitration and declined to entertain further applications.
-
Arbitration law — Referral to arbitration cedes court jurisdiction — Court obliged to honour arbitration agreement; inability to hear matters once jurisdiction ceded; procedural delay attributable to counsel’s failure to appoint arbitrator.
|
|
Judgment |
16 October 2024 |
|
An appeal can be struck out for inordinate delay where the appellant fails to ensure timely preparation of the record of appeal.
-
Civil procedure — Appeal — Want of prosecution — Delay in preparation of record of appeal — Duties of appellant and court under procedural rules — Inherent jurisdiction to strike out appeal — Suspension of enforcement vacated — Costs under s72 Labour Relations Act
|
|
Judgment |
11 October 2024 |
|
Applicant granted leave to appeal out of time; time enlarged seven days; no order for costs.
-
Civil procedure — leave to appeal out of time — enlargement of time — requirement of good and substantial reasons — prima facie merits of proposed grounds — undue delay.
|
|
Judgment |
30 September 2024 |
|
Applicant granted seven-day enlargement and leave to appeal out of time after showing good and substantial reasons and prima facie merit.
-
Civil procedure — enlargement of time for appeal — leave to appeal out of time — requirement of good and substantial reasons — prima facie merits of proposed grounds — undue delay — discretionary relief (NBS Bank Ltd v R.J. Hamdani)
|
|
Judgment |
30 September 2024 |
|
Court refused to forfeit a bonded motor vehicle for late passport surrender, applying substantial justice and not punishing counsel‑caused delay.
-
Bail conditions — bonded property — forfeiture for non‑compliance; substantial justice over technicality; liability for counsel’s procedural failures; exercise of judicial leniency.
|
|
Judgment |
17 September 2024 |
|
Registrar’s refusal to issue admission petitions was a judicial act; appeal, not judicial review, was the appropriate remedy.
-
Judicial review — Registrar's refusal to issue court documents — issuance as a judicial function requiring application of judicial mind — decisions of Registrar exercising judicial functions not amenable to judicial review — alternative remedy by appeal — exhaustion of remedies.
|
|
Judgment |
12 August 2024 |
|
Convictions upheld; enhanced sentences set aside because the appellant was not given notice or a hearing before enhancement.
-
Criminal law — Defilement and child trafficking — Convictions upheld; Sentence enhancement — appellate increase set aside for failure to afford audi alteram partem — Right to be heard before adverse sentencing order — Late filing of skeleton arguments allowed as exception — State nonattendance at apex court criticized.
|
|
Judgment |
23 July 2024 |
|
Failure to comply with scheduling conference directions justified striking out the 1st defendant’s defence and dismissing its counterclaim.
-
Civil procedure — scheduling conference directions — mandatory compliance with Order 14 — effect of non-compliance (Order 14 r.5) — striking out defence and dismissal of counterclaim as sanction — section 47 General Interpretation Act inapplicable to court directions — good cause required to avoid sanctions.
|
|
Judgment |
17 July 2024 |
|
Action to set aside a consent order dismissed as disclosing no reasonable cause and an abuse of court process.
-
Civil procedure — setting aside consent orders — necessity to plead and particularise mistake, misrepresentation or material supervening event; remedies against former lawyers versus setting aside consent judgment; dismissal for frivolous, vexatious or abusive proceedings.
|
|
Judgment |
17 July 2024 |
|
A late application for security for costs was dismissed where claimant rebutted jurisdictional and asset concerns and delay made the order oppressive.
-
Security for costs — Order 32 CPR — residence and central management — assets and enforceability of costs — delay in bringing application — prospects of success — oppressive/stifling effect.
|
|
Judgment |
19 June 2024 |
|
Stay of execution upheld where registry-caused appeal delay and respondent’s concealment of related conviction negated discharge.
-
Forfeiture and stay of execution — application to discharge stay for alleged inordinate delay — duty of Registrar/Registry to prepare record of appeal — shortcomings in record not attributable to appellant — concealment of parallel money-laundering conviction involving same seized funds — discretion to refuse relief and award costs.
|
|
Judgment |
19 June 2024 |
|
Appeal dismissed for lack of mandatory leave and lateness; review misuse condemned and stays discharged for prompt prosecution.
-
Criminal procedure — Appeals from High Court in criminal review — Mandatory requirement for leave under section 11(2) — Time limits for notice of appeal under section 17(1) — Misuse of review as substitute for appeal — Stays discharged and case remitted for directions.
|
|
Judgment |
2 May 2024 |
|
An applicant cannot obtain leave to appeal to the SCA on an interlocutory matter without certified lower-court refusal and procedural propriety.
-
Civil procedure — Leave to appeal — Requirement to seek leave in the court below and to produce certified refusal before approaching appellate court — Interlocutory/non-final matters not appealable — Procedural propriety for litigants in person.
|
|
Judgment |
19 February 2024 |