- Case indexes > Environmental
- Case indexes > Environmental > Criminal offences in environmental law
- Case indexes > Environmental > Criminal offences in environmental law > Private prosecutions
- Case indexes > Environmental > Environmental decision-making
- Case indexes > Environmental > Environmental decision-making > Cultural and heritage values in the environment
- Case indexes > Environmental > Human and environmental rights > African customary law and rights of indigenous peoples
- Case summary
This was an appeal to the High Court against the decision of a magistrate to dismiss the appellant’s claim which concerned a dispute over a customary piece of land. While the appellant stated that the part of the land in dispute was his, the respondent maintained otherwise.
The issue for determination was whether the land belonged to the respondent or the appellant. The court held that in civil cases, the evidence was on a balance of probability. As such, the respondent’s evidence that he was the one given the land by the chief carried more weight and was therefore convincing. The court further held that customary lands were owned communally, which meant that the chief did not own the land as his belonging. Therefore, the court stated that the chief did not have the power to deprive one person of land and give it to another. In conclusion, the court upheld the decision of the court below and accordingly dismissed the appeal.
This document is 246.5 KB. Do you want to load it?