Human Rights

10 documents
Human Rights
  • Filters
  • Years
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
10 documents
Title
Date
The claimant’s late-registered lease was void; earlier registered lease prevails and the trespass claim is dismissed.
Deeds Registration Act – mandatory registration period; late registration renders instrument void – priority of registration under s.8 Trespass – possessory tort; possession ordinarily sufficient but yields to superior registered title. Nemo dat quod non habet – unregistered surrender ineffective; re-grant by minister invalid if prior lease subsists. Res judicata – default judicial review judgment not a merits-based bar; identity of parties and merits required Limitation – bars affirmative claims but does not preclude defendants relying on historical title defensively Relief – interlocutory injunction vacated; court-directed survey to demarcate customary land boundaries
Judgment 30 December 2025
A raped minor’s denial of abortion breached reproductive rights; law and guidelines require considering mental-health grounds for termination.
Gender Equality Act – right to sexual and reproductive health; Penal Code s243 – preservation of life includes mental health; vicarious liability of employer; duty to impart information; Minister’s duty to provide clear clinical guidance; Human Rights Commission enforcement obligations; access to lawful abortion for minors impregnated by sexual violence.
Judgment 28 October 2025
Criminal defamation provision struck down as an unconstitutional, disproportionate limit on freedom of expression.
Constitutional law — Freedom of expression — Criminal defamation — Section 200 Penal Code — Overbreadth, vagueness and chilling effect — Section 44 limitation test — Civil remedies as less restrictive means — Attorney General’s neutral role in constitutional referrals.
Judgment 17 July 2025
Whether criminal defamation (section 200) unjustifiably limits freedom of expression and must be struck down.
Criminal defamation – Freedom of expression (section 35) – Limitation test (section 44(1),(2)) – Proportionality and necessity – Civil remedies as less restrictive means – Chilling effect – Decriminalisation consistent with regional and international jurisprudence – Attorney General’s impartial role in constitutional referrals.
Judgment 17 July 2025
Judgment 12 January 2025
Retrospective application of the FCA was found by necessary implication but did not violate constitutional protections against conviction for non-offences.
Constitutional law – retrospectivity of statutes – Financial Crimes Act section 42 vs repealed MLA section 35 – interpretation of saving provision section 141(2) FCA – right not to be convicted for non-existent offence and protection against harsher retrospective penalties – procedural commencement via constitutional referral (Order 19 CPR).
Judgment 10 April 2024
Applicant’s rush to appellate court was premature; lower court’s decision to hear matter inter partes was within its CPR case-management discretion.
Administrative law – judicial review – leave to apply and interim injunction – ex parte v inter partes hearings – case management discretion under CPR – balance of convenience and public interest in stays of administrative decisions.
Judgment 4 July 2023
The applicant's convictions were upheld on circumstantial evidence and call logs despite improper use of section 3 CP&EC.
Criminal law ircumstantial evidence dmissibility of call logs/business records alse police statement as perjury xtradition (s.21) ddition of lesser offences provable by extradition facts xclusion of illegally obtained evidence nd limited scope of s.3 CP&EC
Judgment 14 July 2021
Applicant challenged project implementation without mandatory EIA, obtained leave to seek judicial review and disclosure of project documents.
Environmental law – Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) requirement – Environment Management Act s24 and GN No.58/1998 – public interest standing – locus standi of a statutory body – leave to apply for judicial review – interlocutory injunction in judicial review (urgency requirement for ex parte relief) – constitutional right of access to information (s37) – disclosure of project documents.
Judgment 21 April 2017
Applicant challenged return-to-camp order; court held ID was not a residence permit and dismissed the challenge.
Refugee law – residence restrictions – identity card versus urban residence permit – standing – procedural fairness (s.43 Constitution) – discrimination (ss.20 & 44) – Article 26 reservation – ultra vires delegation – Immigration Act authority
Judgment 17 April 2008