Corruption

5 documents
Corruption
  • Filters
  • Years
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
5 documents
Title
Date
High Court set aside committal for extradition due to procedural unfairness, evidentiary defects, improper authentication, and safety concerns for applicants.
Extradition — procedural fairness — right to be heard; adequacy of judicial reasons; authentication of extradition documents; hearsay and admissibility; linkage between ATP, warrants and charges; specialty and statutory compliance; consideration of safety, delay and bad faith.
Judgment 31 October 2025
Court refused challenge to Acting Director’s authority, stayed 24‑hour production requirement, and granted review permission on campaign speech vs ACB investigatory powers.
Administrative law – judicial review; Actings appointments – authority of Deputy Director to act as Director; Anti‑Corruption Bureau powers – s.10–11 Corrupt Practices Act; Electoral law – freedom of expression during campaign (constitutional s.35 and Elections Act s.53–55); Reasonableness of statutory document production timelines; Interim stay to protect campaign speech.
Judgment 31 August 2025
Criminal defamation provision struck down as an unconstitutional, disproportionate limit on freedom of expression.
Constitutional law — Freedom of expression — Criminal defamation — Section 200 Penal Code — Overbreadth, vagueness and chilling effect — Section 44 limitation test — Civil remedies as less restrictive means — Attorney General’s neutral role in constitutional referrals.
Judgment 17 July 2025
Whether criminal defamation (section 200) unjustifiably limits freedom of expression and must be struck down.
Criminal defamation – Freedom of expression (section 35) – Limitation test (section 44(1),(2)) – Proportionality and necessity – Civil remedies as less restrictive means – Chilling effect – Decriminalisation consistent with regional and international jurisprudence – Attorney General’s impartial role in constitutional referrals.
Judgment 17 July 2025
Court orders in‑chambers inspection of classified Defence documents; dismisses time‑barred breach‑of‑trust counts under section 302A.
Criminal procedure — disclosure vs national security — in-camera judicial inspection of classified Defence Council/MDF documents; public interest immunity; right to fair trial and disclosure obligations; particulars of bribery charges (unspecified amounts) — not fatal; statutory limitation — section 302A CP&EC — strict construction, time-barred misdemeanour counts discharged.
Judgment 12 January 2024