Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
High Court of Malawi Civil Division
High Court of Malawi Civil Division - 2022 June
8 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Lilongwe District Registry
Mzuzu District Registry
Principal Registry
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2008
2007
2003
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1990
1988
1987
1986
1985
1981
1973
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2008
2007
2003
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1990
1988
1987
1986
1985
1981
1973
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Filters
Filters
Judges
Kacheche Deputy Registrar
Kapaswiche AR
Ligowe J
Alphabet
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Sort by:
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
8 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
June 2022
S (on Application of Stanley Chipeta) v Council of Mzuzu University (Civil Cause 63 of 2021) [2022] MWHCCiv 46 (29 June 2022)
Taxation on the standard basis; instruction fee partly allowed, brief fees disallowed, total taxed costs MK30,421,125.
Costs taxation – standard basis assessment – counsel hourly rate – instruction fee allowed; brief fees disallowed – reduction of excessive hours and disbursements – care and conduct uplift.
29 June 2022
Mwanyongo v Mwakaileke and Another (Civil Cause 1 of 2016) [2022] MWHCCiv 64 (28 June 2022)
Default judgment awarding declarations, injunction and damages for trespass on claimant's leased land; damages to be assessed by Registrar.
Property law – Trespass – Default judgment – Declaratory relief and permanent injunction – Damages to be assessed by Registrar to include inconvenience.
28 June 2022
Baton v Makubi & Anor. (Personal Injury Cause 734 of 2021) [2022] MWHCCiv 34 (24 June 2022)
24 June 2022
Gama v Maldeco Fisheries (Personal Injury 388 of 2017) [2022] MWHCCiv 30 (24 June 2022)
Assessment of damages for asbestos exposure: non-pecuniary losses awarded; brain damage and loss of earning capacity not proved.
Personal injury — Asbestos exposure — Assessment of damages — Pain and suffering; loss of amenities; special damages proof; loss of earning capacity — Necessity of medical proof for brain damage and receipts for special expenses.
24 June 2022
Robert v Friday & Anor. (Personal Injury Cause 515 of 2020) [2022] MWHCCiv 29 (24 June 2022)
Damages assessed after admitted liability; policy-limit evidence improper at assessment; awards based on minimum wage and multiplier.
Assessment of damages – procedure where parties fail to agree after mediation – inadmissibility of policy-limit evidence at damages assessment – representation and binding effect of admissions – computation method for loss of dependency using minimum wage and multiplier.
24 June 2022
Chirwa v Kamanga (Civil Cause 109 of 2020) [2022] MWHCCiv 25 (23 June 2022)
Court awarded MK4,810,000 for proven injuries, rejecting unproven traumatic brain injury and unsubstantiated business income.
Road traffic accident — quantum of damages — pain and suffering, loss of amenities, disfigurement — loss of earnings and earning capacity — proof of traumatic brain injury and business income — reliance on comparable awards.
23 June 2022
Nankhumwa ( Suing on behalf of Owen Nankhumwa) v Charles and Prime Insurance Company Limited (Civil Cause 929 of 2019) [2022] MWHCCiv 38 (23 June 2022)
Assessment of personal injury damages after default judgment: court awards MK12,000,000 for pain, disfigurement and 28% incapacity.
Personal injury — assessment of damages — pain and suffering, loss of amenities, disfigurement — permanent incapacitation assessed at 28% — use of comparable awards — default judgment — quantum and costs.
23 June 2022
Republic v Million (Criminal Case 30 of 2019) [2022] MWHCCiv 42 (23 June 2022)
The respondent’s five‑year sentence for defiling a 12‑year‑old was manifestly inadequate and increased to 14 years.
Criminal law – Defilement – Sentencing – Starting point of 14 years for victims at the lower end of age spectrum – Review standard for sentences: error in principle/manifestly inadequate or excessive – Aggravating factors: victim age (12), use of force and threats, significant age gap – Mitigation: youth and first offender status insufficient to justify leniency.
23 June 2022
1
>