Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Collections
Case indexes
Elections
Electoral Offences and Penalties
2 documents
Advanced search
Filters
Skip to results
Electoral Offences and Penalties
Filters
Years
Skip to next filter group
2020
2019
Topics
Skip to next filter group
Campaign methods and materials
Campaign period
Campaign-related offences
Compilation of results at district level
Complaints after the electoral process
Counting procedures at polling stations
Declaration of results
Determination of national results
Establishment of polling stations
For parliamentary elections
General electoral offences
Logistics and procurement for elections
Polling station officers
Powers and duties of the Electoral Commission
Presence of party representatives and observers
Prohibited campaign practices
Registration process
Voters registers
Voting materials and equipment
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 2 documents found.
2 documents
Title
Sort by Title ascending
Date
Sort by Date ascending
Chilima & Anor. v Mutharika & Anor. (Constitutional Reference 1 of 2019) [2020] MWHC 2 (3 February 2020)
Court found pervasive irregularities in election administration, nullified the presidential result and ordered fresh elections within 150 days.
Electoral law — presidential election — management of polling, tallying and transmission — use of duplicate, tippexed and altered Form 66C tally sheets — preservation of polling records — role and duties of Electoral Commission under sections 76, 77 and 119 PPEA — standard and burden of proof in electoral petitions — interpretation of "majority of the electorate" under section 80(2) of the Constitution (majority = 50% + 1 of valid votes cast) — remedy: nullification and fresh election.
Judgment
3 February 2020
Chibambo v Electoral Commission (Election Petition 22 of 2019) [2019] MWHCCrim 5 (9 July 2019)
Applicant failed to prove prohibited post‑campaign activity or tally irregularities that affected the election result; petition dismissed.
Electoral law — election petition under s100 — alleged post‑campaign campaigning and inducements — alleged tally/result irregularities — burden and standard of proof (balance of probabilities) — petitioner failed to prove irregularities affected result — petition dismissed.
Judgment
9 July 2019
1
Current page, page 1
>