Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Collections
Case indexes
Commercial
Banking, Finance and Insurance Law
Currency
3 documents
Advanced search
Filters
Skip to results
Currency
Filters
Years
Skip to next filter group
2025
2024
Topics
Skip to next filter group
Criminal law
Foreign Currency
Judicial Review
Legal action on behalf of a company
Money Laundering
Motion to Stay Proceedings
Retrospective criminalisation
Revision of Judgment
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 3 documents found.
3 documents
Title
Sort by Title ascending
Date
Sort by Date ascending
Mukteshwar Sugar Mills Ltd v Salima Sugar Company Ltd (Commercial Cause 136 of 2024) [2025] MWHC 4 (7 February 2025)
Ex parte freezing injunction vacated after applicant suppressed material related‑party and forensic‑audit facts.
Civil procedure — freezing injunctions — Order 10 r.11, r.12(2)(b) CPR — requirements: good and arguable case, assets likely to form part of judgment, risk of dissipation — equitable relief requires full and frank disclosure — clean hands doctrine — proportionality of freezing orders — relevance of forensic audit and related-party conflicts.
Judgment
7 February 2025
R v Uzioigwe (Case No. 03 of 2024 (Being criminal case No. 05 of 2024)) [2024] MWHC 61 (20 November 2024)
Whether seized foreign currency should be forfeited where a businessperson hid funds and used a fake receipt, outweighing mitigating circumstances.
Exchange control — Regulation 36(1) discretionary forfeiture of foreign currency — judicial exercise of discretion — aggravating factors (large sum, concealment, forged receipt, business person) v. mitigating factors (first offender, plea, alleged hardship) — precedents: Kamanga; Zheng Yan; Henry Kopa; Ashraf Bdallal El Ali — requirement to hear accused in opposition to forfeiture.
Judgment
20 November 2024
Batatawala and Another v Director of Anti Corruption Bureau and Another (Constitutional Cause 1 of 2023) [2024] MWHC 19 (10 April 2024)
Retrospective application of the FCA was found by necessary implication but did not violate constitutional protections against conviction for non-offences.
Constitutional law — retrospectivity of statutes — Financial Crimes Act section 42 vs repealed MLA section 35 — interpretation of saving provision section 141(2) FCA — right not to be convicted for non-existent offence and protection against harsher retrospective penalties — procedural commencement via constitutional referral (Order 19 CPR).
Judgment
10 April 2024
1
Current page, page 1
>