Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
All courts
All courts - 2013 August
3 judgments
Advanced search
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1974
1973
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1974
1973
Months
Skip past months
All months
February
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Browse by month
All months
February
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Kachale J
Mbvundula J
Pemba AR
Courts
Skip to next filter group
High Court of Malawi
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Most cited
Filter
Results. 3 judgments found.
3 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
August 2013
Palapate v Prime Insurance Co. Ltd. (Miscellaneous Civil Cause 81 of 2012) [2013] MWHC 502 (15 August 2013)
A bare assertion that damages may exceed subordinate court limits does not justify transfer to the High Court.
Civil Procedure — Transfer of Proceedings — Whether transfer to High Court under s 11(a)(vii) should be ordered where plaintiff alleges damages will exceed subordinate court jurisdiction — Applicant must demonstrate likely quantum by reference to facts or precedents — Courts Act s 11(a)(vii)
15 August 2013
Mpotandevu v R (Criminal Appeal 185 of 2012) [2013] MWHC 491 (8 August 2013)
Court quashed robbery and unlawful wounding convictions where evidence was insufficient and a plea of guilty was improperly accepted.
Criminal law — sufficiency of evidence for robbery conviction — duplication of convictions; Criminal procedure — plea of guilty — admissibility and weight of caution/denial statements (Rep v Chikakuda) — requirement to treat qualified admissions as not guilty pleas.
8 August 2013
Dziopani v Auhad Steel Manufacturing Company Limited (Personal Injury Cause 494 of 2012) [2013] MWHC 490 (3 August 2013)
The applicant may have a default judgment set aside if their affidavit discloses an arguable defence on the merits.
Default judgment — setting aside under Order 13 r.9/Order 19 r.9; discretionary power; requirement to disclose an arguable defence on the merits; delay and prejudice; implied stay of proceedings following stay of execution; restoration of summons.
3 August 2013
1
Current page, page 1
>