All courts - 2006

48 judgments
Skip past years
Skip past months
Skip to results

Results. 48 judgments found.

48 judgments
December 2006
Applicants awarded damages for false imprisonment after unjustified 83-day detention; respondent did not defend.
  • False imprisonment — unlawful arrest and 83-day detention — absence of reasonable suspicion — assessment of damages for loss of liberty, dignity and reputation — Attorney General failure to defend — substantive award despite default.
31 December 2006
Where the accident's cause was established, res ipsa loquitur did not apply and nominal damages were awarded due to default-judgment uncertainty.
  • Motor vehicle accident — mechanical failure (severed wheel nuts) — res ipsa loquitur inapplicable where cause known — plaintiff must prove lack of due diligence — default judgment binds assessment but caution warranted — nominal damages awarded.
31 December 2006
Summary judgment refused where respondent raised a bona fide counterclaim and disputed valuation and workmanship requiring trial.
  • Civil procedure — Summary judgment (Order 14) — Bona fide counter-claim treated as defence — Set-off — Contractual requirement of interim certificate for payment — Dispute as to payment and defective workmanship — Need for trial and possible expert valuation.
31 December 2006
Applicant awarded six years’ salary for wrongful forced retirement; pension and gratuity denied for lack of evidence.
  • Employment law — wrongful/forced retirement — assessment of damages measured by prospective salary less mitigation; pension and gratuity require proof; mitigation considered in light of employee’s age.
31 December 2006
Assessment of damages for negligent contamination: general damages awarded; pecuniary and unpleaded special claims dismissed.
  • Tort — negligence — assessment of damages for personal injury; special damages must be pleaded and proved; proof required for loss of earning capacity and reduced life expectancy; multiplier method for future medical expenses; award of general damages for pain and suffering.
31 December 2006
Application for interest on delayed payment of damages against the government dismissed due to statutory limits and no wrongful withholding.
  • Interest on judgment debts — discretionary award — section 11(a)(v) Courts Act limits — distinction between debt and damages — equitable principle of wrongful withholding (London, Chatham & Dover) — execution against Government.
31 December 2006
Repair cost is the normal measure of damages for negligent vehicle damage; court awarded the reasonable repair quotation.
  • Tort — Motor vehicle damage — Measure of damages for physical damage is reasonable cost of repair — Competing repair quotations — Court may assess damages on available evidence where defendant fails to attend.
31 December 2006
Assessment of general damages for pain and suffering where medical incapacity exists but no proven loss of earning capacity.
  • Tort — Negligence — Assessment of damages — General damages for pain and suffering and loss of amenities — Medical evidence of permanent incapacitation — No loss of earning capacity where plaintiff obtained higher-paid work — Special damages must be pleaded.
31 December 2006
Whether cohabitation established a marriage entitling the applicant and her child to a share of and an accounting for the estate.
  • Intestate succession; marriage by cohabitation/custom; proof of issue; defective unsworn affidavit; summary judgment; duty of personal representatives to account.
31 December 2006
Assessment awards general and special damages for personal injuries; unpleaded loss of earning capacity disallowed.
  • Damages — assessment of general and special damages for personal injury — unpleaded loss of earning capacity cannot be awarded — prospective expenses for disability considered.
31 December 2006
The applicant was awarded K1,050,000 for amputation caused by negligent hospital treatment, plus costs.
  • Medical negligence — assessment of damages — amputation following improper IV insertion — res ipsa loquitur applicable; damages compensatory: pain and suffering, loss of amenities, medical expenses — default judgment on liability.
31 December 2006
Nominal damages awarded for alleged false imprisonment despite defendant's honest belief and binding default judgment.
  • False imprisonment — reasonable suspicion / honest belief defence — nominal damages awarded despite prior default judgment — assessment of damages.
31 December 2006
Court dismisses bank's appeal, finding employee not party to fraud and dismissal unfair; damages upheld.
  • Employment law — unfair dismissal; factual findings on bank procedures and manager's duties final under s65 Labour Relations Act; absence of mens rea precludes dismissal for fraud; statutory awards (12 weeks, severance, s63(4) compensation) upheld.
19 December 2006
The respondent held liable in tort for injuries caused by its security dog; Registrar to assess damages.
  • Tort — Animals — Dog bite — Strict liability of owner and negligence — Control and Diseases of Animals Act s19
17 December 2006
Refusal to renew a genuine fixed-term contract does not constitute unfair dismissal under the Employment Act.
  • :[
11 December 2006
Court ordered defendants to clarify "expedience" and required plaintiff to provide specified further particulars before trial.
  • Civil Procedure
    • — Pleadings — Clarification of ambiguous pleading term ("expedience") required where material to issues
    • — Summons for directions — Further and better particulars under Order 25 r.7 — Scope and timing
  • Contract — Specific performance — Allegation of agreement to issue shares evaluated through pleadings and pre-trial particulars
3 December 2006
November 2006
Divorce petition dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the petitioner was not domiciled in Malawi.
  • Family Law — Divorce — Jurisdiction and domicile — Whether petitioner domiciled in Malawi under s.2 of the Divorce Act — Domicile of origin persists unless displaced by an affirmed domicile of choice; employment alone is insufficient
13 November 2006
Plaintiff failed to prove authorisation codes were invalid; debit of merchant’s account was unjustified.
  • Contract — Merchant Card Agreements — Validity of Authorisation Codes — Burden of Proof and Failure to Call Principal’s Witnesses
13 November 2006
Vice‑President lacks criminal immunity; covert recordings breached privacy and judicial review cannot be used to strike down statutes.
  • Constitutional law
    • — Judicial review — Scope and appropriateness for challenging statutory validity
    • — Immunity — Vice‑President not immune from criminal prosecution under section 91(2)
  • Criminal procedure — Arrest and detention — 48‑hour rule; rights to be informed and fair procedural/adminstrative action
8 November 2006
Convictions quashed for failure to authenticate documentary evidence and for a defective Section 122 charge.
  • Criminal Law
    • — Documentary Evidence — Authentication and admissibility of photocopies under the Criminal Procedure and Evidence (Documentary Evidence) Rules
    • — Offences Against Public Administration — Section 122 Penal Code — Particulars must disclose a statutory offence and inform the accused with sufficient particularity
    • — Uttering False Document — Proof beyond reasonable doubt requires establishing the document was tendered by accused and that accused knew it was false
6 November 2006
Section 65(1) is constitutionally valid but applies only to MPs who were party members at election; independents are excluded.
  • Constitutional Law
    • — Parliamentary Membership — Crossing the Floor (s65) — Validity and scope of application
    • — Political Rights — Free mandate and freedom of association (s65(2)) — Protection of free parliamentary vote
6 November 2006
Section 65 is constitutionally valid; MPs who abandon party allegiance or join another party may lose their seat, subject to factual nuance.
  • Constitutional Law
    • — Legislature — Crossing the Floor (Section 65) — Validity vis‑à‑vis rights to association, conscience and expression — Purposive interpretation
    • — Parliamentary Membership — Meaning of “member at time of election” — Effect on independents and sole‑party representatives
    • — Executive Appointments — Ministerial appointment from another party — May amount to floor‑crossing depending on party approval and facts
6 November 2006
Convictions quashed where photocopied documents lacked authentication and charge particulars failed to disclose a statutory offence.
  • Criminal Law
    • — Documentary Evidence — Authentication and admissibility of photocopied exhibits under the Criminal Procedure and Evidence (Documentary Evidence) Rules
    • — Forgery/Uttering — Elements: identity of document, mens rea, and proof beyond reasonable doubt
  • Constitutional Law — Fair Trial — Particulars of charge and right to be informed with sufficient particularity (presumption of innocence and right to silence)
6 November 2006
Judicial review limited to process‑based complaints; surreptitious recordings breached privacy warranting damages; Vice‑President not immune to prosecution.
  • Constitutional law
    • — Judicial review — Scope and limitations; challenge to constitutionality of statutes not by judicial review
    • — Right to privacy — Use of surreptitious recordings in criminal process — Wednesbury unreasonableness and damages
    • — Executive immunity — Section 91(2) construed as granting criminal immunity to President only; Vice‑President not immune
6 November 2006
Default judgment reflecting amounts endorsed on an amended writ is not irregular merely because it includes non-recoverable collection costs.
  • Civil Procedure
    • — Default Judgment — Inclusion of non-recoverable collection costs on writ — Whether renders judgment irregular — Order 19 r.2(1) RSC
    • — Amendment of Pleadings — Effect of amended writ on entitlement to enter judgment — Order 13 r.1 RSC
  • Execution — Sheriff's Fees — Reimbursement where execution followed a regular judgment — When reimbursement is unjustified
1 November 2006
October 2006
Summary judgment granted for undisputed account balance where defendant's denials were general and unsupported.
  • Civil Procedure
    • — Summary Judgment — Whether summary judgment appropriate where defendant raises general denials and account reconciliations
    • — Rehearing on Appeal — Appeal from Assistant Registrar to judge in chambers is by way of rehearing
31 October 2006
An insurer not party to proceedings cannot appear or be subrogated without first indemnifying the insured.
  • Civil Procedure
    • — Appeals from Registrar — Re‑hearing under Order 58 — Issues may be raised afresh on appeal
    • — Representation — Non‑party insurer’s right of audience — Insurance policy clause insufficient to confer right to appear; party status required
  • Insurance Law — Subrogation — Requirement of indemnity — Insurer not subrogated where it has not paid the insured
31 October 2006
High Court dismissed appeal because no question of law or jurisdiction was raised under s65(2) Labour Relations Act.
  • Labour Law — Appeals — Scope of appeal from Industrial Relations Court under section 65(2) Labour Relations Act — Whether quantum of compensation is reviewable absent a question of law or jurisdiction
30 October 2006
Injunction granted protecting the plaintiff’s exclusive right to distribute 'Exide' batteries, excluding the revenue authority.
  • Intellectual Property — Trade Mark — Injunction to restrain dealing in goods bearing protected trade mark — Application of American Cyanamid principles
  • Administrative Law — Public Revenue Agency — Injunction against revenue collector — Practicality and balance of convenience
30 October 2006
Interlocutory injunction restraining termination of a statutory chief officer refused for lack of a good arguable case and because damages suffice.
  • Interlocutory injunction; employment contract vs judicial review; American Cyanamid principles; doctrine of necessity; adequacy of damages.
30 October 2006
Failure to give reasons and follow transparent selection breached legitimate expectations, warranting quashing and remedial assistance.
  • Administrative Law — Procedural Fairness — Legitimate expectation and requirement to give reasons in public funding decisions — Constitution s 43
  • Civil Procedure — Proper Parties in Judicial Review — Attorney General not a proper respondent unless privy to the challenged decision
26 October 2006
Plaintiff’s writ allowed where earlier originating summons was improperly served and inappropriate; injunction consolidated into the writ.
  • Civil Procedure
    • — Abuse of Process — Commencing writ after originating summons on same subject-matter — Court’s power to prevent improper multiplicity of proceedings
    • — Service and Mode of Commencement — Defective service and wrong use of originating summons — Order 10 r 1; Order 65 r 4; Order 5 r 4
12 October 2006
September 2006
Court refused to vacate an ex parte interlocutory injunction despite delay, finding prima facie title and favouring preservation of the status quo.
  • Civil Procedure
    • — Interlocutory Injunctions — Vacatur of ex parte injunction for delay and non-disclosure
    • — Preservation of Status Quo — Whether title disputes require full trial rather than interlocutory determination
  • Property Law — Tort — Trespass to land — Adequacy of damages and balance of convenience
25 September 2006
A biological son born of a matrilineal marriage cannot be disqualified from chieftaincy succession solely on that ground.
  • Customary Law
    • — Chieftaincy Succession — Whether a son born of a matrilineal marriage may succeed under Ngoni custom — Interaction with constitutional equality provisions
    • — Succession Procedure — Validity of nomination by late Chief’s counsellors where a qualified child exists
12 September 2006
A presidential referral does not permit appeals from interlocutory orders; leave to appeal and stay were refused.
  • Constitutional Law —  Presidential Referral
    • — Appealability of interlocutory orders in referrals
    • — Leave to appeal and stay of proceedings where President seeks advisory opinion — Section 89(1)(h) Constitution
3 September 2006
August 2006
Appeal dismissed where customary leaders' and court findings of appellant's encroachment were upheld.
  • Civil Law — Land Boundaries — Determination by Traditional Leaders — Court's deference to customary determinations
  • Tort — Trespass — Encroachment despite long-term cultivation — Effect of customary leaders' decisions on possession
31 August 2006
July 2006
Severance under s35(1) is not payable on an employee’s resignation; acceptance does not create mutual agreement.
  • Employment Law — Severance Allowance — Whether severance payable on employee resignation — Interpretation of "mutual agreement" — Employment Act s 35(1)
31 July 2006
Order 113 summary possession unavailable where financier’s unregistered memorandum failed to oust a purchaser’s title.
  • Property Law
    • — Possession Procedure — Applicability of RSC Order 113 r.1 to persons in possession who acquired title from an owner
    • — Deeds Registration — Non‑registration renders instrument null and void — Deeds Registration Act ss 6, 28
  • Equitable Interests — Security for Loans — Provision of funds does not of itself confer legal title
25 July 2006
Court granted and extended an interim injunction, ordered interpleader, condemned unresponsive claimant to costs, and granted leave to appeal.
  • Civil Procedure
    • — Interim Injunctions — Ex parte injunctions to preserve status quo pending trial
    • — Interpleader/Trial Procedure — Order 17 r 5 RSC and ordering full trial where facts are in dispute
    • — Costs — Sanctions for failure to participate and costs consequences of negligent silence by a respondent
12 July 2006
May 2006
Defendant held severally liable under s42(1) where company effectively had only one member; collection charges denied.
  • Company Law
    • — Membership — Whether company membership fell below two and sole-member liability under s42(1)
    • — Shares — Whether an office entry (“General Manager”) on the register constitutes a legal member
    • — Remedies — Application of s42(1) liability and discretion under s42(2) — Relief and costs
23 May 2006
Section 71 permits sale by private treaty or auction; reserve-price approval required only for auctions, remedy for irregularity is damages.
  • Registered Land Act s.71 — construction of 'shall' and 'may'; permissive sale by private treaty or public auction; reserve price required only for auctions; duty to act in good faith; remedy for irregular exercise = damages (s.71(3)); injunctions ordinarily not available.
12 May 2006
April 2006
Whether the defendant validly cancelled an auction sale for non‑payment of the balance and claimed rentals.
  • Contract Law
    • — Sale by Auction — Cancellation for non‑payment of balance — Time for payment and waiver/estoppel — Interpretation of auction conditions
    • — Remedies — Possession and rents prior to full payment — Deduction of rentals on cancellation
    • — Liquidated Damages — Requirement of proper pleading and evidence for recovery
26 April 2006
Plaintiff’s failure of full and frank disclosure in an ex parte injunction led to its discharge and dismissal with costs.
  • Civil Procedure — Interlocutory Injunctions — Full and frank disclosure required for ex parte relief
  • Commercial Law — Security for Debt — Bank’s contractual and legal right to sell pledged property on borrower default
12 April 2006
February 2006
Whether collateral for an expired bank guarantee can secure an unrelated overdraft without the borrower’s agreement.
  • Banking Law — Security for Credit Facilities — Whether collateral securing a bank guarantee can be enforced against a separate overdraft absent agreement — Burden on bank to prove consolidation
28 February 2006
14 February 2006
Manufacturer liable in tort for contaminated opaque-bottled beer causing plaintiff’s shock and physical illness.
  • Tort
    • — Product Liability — Manufacturer’s duty to ensure consumer products are safe (Donoghue v Stevenson)
    • — Negligence — Causation and presence of contaminant when product left manufacturer — Control and inspection
    • — Nervous Shock — Injury caused by perception of contamination — Damages recoverable where physical or medical symptoms follow
13 February 2006
Court ordered release of 519 fertilizer bags, finding the consent order did not permit additional storage charges or lien.
  • Civil Procedure — Interlocutory/Mandatory Injunction — Granting exceptional mandatory relief to compel delivery of goods under a consent order
  • Contract — Consent Orders — Scope and enforceability — Whether consent order impliedly allowed further storage charges or extended lien
1 February 2006
January 2006
Court awarded custody to the mother, prioritising the child’s welfare over status quo with paternal grandmother.
  • Family Law
    • — Child Custody — Custody allocation between parent and grandparent — Child’s welfare paramount — Constitution s 23(3)
    • — Jurisdiction — Court may determine custody despite an alleged subsisting customary marriage
31 January 2006