Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal
Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal - 2015 May
2 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Principal Registry
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1989
1988
1986
1981
1979
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1989
1988
1986
1981
1979
Months
Skip past months
All months
February
May
June
July
August
September
October
Browse by month
All months
February
May
June
July
August
September
October
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Ansah JA
Chikopa JA
Chinangwa JA
Chipeta JA
I.C. Kamanga JA
Mbendera JA
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 2 judgments found.
2 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
May 2015
Mbale v Maganga (Misc. Civil Appeal 21 of 2013) [2015] MWSC 1 (31 May 2015)
Commercial Division lacked jurisdiction; Limitation Act is a defence only; respondent failed to prove adverse possession.
Civil Procedure
— Jurisdiction — Competence of Commercial Division to hear non‑commercial land disputes — Order 1 r.4(2) High Court (Commercial Division) Rules — s.108 Constitution
— Originating Summons — Unsuitable where there are substantial disputes of fact; parties should be ordered to proceed by writ
Property Law — Adverse Possession — Whether an encroacher may sue to acquire title under Limitation Act — Limitation Act s.6; established requirement of factual possession and animus possidendi
31 May 2015
Taipi v R (Criminal Appeal 9 of 2014) [2015] MWSC 474 (18 May 2015)
Statutory pre-trial detention limits do not strip courts of constitutional discretion to refuse bail in the interests of justice.
Constitutional supremacy — pre-trial custody time limits (Sections 161G & 161I C.P. & E.C.) do not displace Section 42(2)(e) 'interests of justice' bail discretion; post-expiry bail applications remain discretionary; prior escape and lengthy evasion justify refusal as flight risk; State negligence in prosecuting may trigger conditional release.
18 May 2015
1
Current page, page 1
>