Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
High Court of Malawi Civil Division
High Court of Malawi Civil Division - 1997 September
2 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Lilongwe District Registry- Civil Division
Mzuzu District Registry
Principal Registry - civil division
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2008
2007
2003
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1990
1988
1987
1986
1985
1981
1973
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2008
2007
2003
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1990
1988
1987
1986
1985
1981
1973
Months
Skip past months
All months
January
February
March
May
June
August
September
October
Browse by month
All months
January
February
March
May
June
August
September
October
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Mwaungulu J
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 2 judgments found.
2 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
September 1997
Kuwali v AG (Civil Cause 1684 of 1994) [1997] MWHCCiv 15 (16 September 1997)
Default judgment set aside where detention was unlawfully prolonged and Limitation Act, not post‑Constitution tribunal, governed pre‑commencement claims.
Civil procedure — setting aside judgment in default — triable issues — wrongful detention — Preservation of Public Security Act — Limitation Act s.4(1), s.22(4) — Constitution Chapter XIII — National Compensation Tribunal — jurisdiction for pre‑commencement actions.
16 September 1997
Shiptrade International Co. Ltd v Transglobe Produce Exports (Civil Cause 957 of 1994) [1997] MWHCCiv 16 (15 September 1997)
A consent order binds only the consenting parties; rescission requires a fresh action or appeal, not a Registrar’s interlocutory setting-aside.
Civil procedure — Consent orders — Nature of consent judgment as contractual agreement between parties — Privity of contract; cannot bind third parties — Rescission of consent orders requires fresh action or appeal — Registrar lacked jurisdiction to set aside consent order — Disputes over sheriff’s fees to be resolved by Master/taxation.
15 September 1997
1
Current page, page 1
>