Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
High Court of Malawi
Principal Registry
Principal Registry - 2011 October
2 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Blantyre Principal Registry
Lilongwe District Criminal Registry
Lilongwe District Registry
Lilongwe District Registry - Financial Crimes Division
Principal Registry
Zomba District Registry
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1978
1977
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1978
1977
Months
Skip past months
All months
March
April
May
June
October
Browse by month
All months
March
April
May
June
October
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Mbvundula J
Tembo DR
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 2 judgments found.
2 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
October 2011
Tambala v Tomato and others (Land Civil Case 66 of 2011) [2011] MWHC 104 (11 October 2011)
11 October 2011
Amos Suluma (suing on his own behalf and on behalf of 49 other Chancellor College Bachelor of Education mature entry students whose fees were paid for by the Ministry of Education following the court order in Miscellaneous Civil Cause No. 49 of 2006) v The Attorney General (Civil Cause 2510 of 2007) [2011] MWHC 107 (7 October 2011)
Summary judgment refused: prior judicial review order did not mandate payment and circular allowances were conditional, requiring individual proof.
Administrative law — judicial review order construed as directive to find sponsorship, not monetary judgment; Civil procedure — summary judgment (Order 14) inappropriate where entitlement conditional and triable issues exist; Contract/employment law — statutory/circular allowances are conditional and require individual proof.
7 October 2011
1
Current page, page 1
>