Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
High Court of Malawi
Lilongwe District Registry
Lilongwe District Registry - 2025 September
2 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Blantyre Principal Registry
Lilongwe District Criminal Registry
Lilongwe District Registry
Lilongwe District Registry - Financial Crimes Division
Principal Registry
Zomba District Registry
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2013
2005
2004
2001
1999
1994
1993
1989
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2013
2005
2004
2001
1999
1994
1993
1989
Months
Skip past months
All months
January
April
July
August
September
December
Browse by month
All months
January
April
July
August
September
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Msiska J
Pemba J
Topics
Skip to next filter group
Appeals to the High Court
Elections
For Members of Parliament
Powers and duties of the Electoral Commission
Withdrawal of candidates
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Most cited
Filter
Results. 2 judgments found.
2 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
September 2025
Ndhlovu v Malawi Electoral Commission (Electoral Case 1 of 2025) [2025] MWHC 22 (10 September 2025)
Application dismissed for being commenced in the wrong procedural form; election challenges require petition or Form 86A originations.
Election procedure — Mode of commencement — Petition under PPLGEA or judicial review by originating motion (Form 86A); CPR cannot add modes; procedural irregularity fatal.
10 September 2025
Sandram v Malawi Electoral Commission (Electoral Case 5 of 2025) [2025] MWHC 23 (9 September 2025)
Failure of the Returning Officer to notify a nomination defect rendered the exclusion unlawful despite incorrect fee paid at presentation.
Election law — nomination fees — age qualification for youth candidates determined at time of presentation — Returning Officer’s duty to notify defects before close of nominations (s.39(2)–(3)) — failure to notify defeats internal remedies (s.99) — judicial review permissible where no communicated decision.
9 September 2025
1
Current page, page 1
>